Another photo taken early this morning near Hwy 194 in Valle Crucis. It is a familiar scene to those living in the area. Oh and I forgot to mention that in the previous two posts as well as with this one, I did do a bit of liberal post-processing in Photoshop. I maybe added a little bit of a vignette or did some selected saturation/desaturation of colors but that is about it. Nothing drastic, just being playful.
In yesterday's comments, Andrea introduced the concept of EcoPorn to me:
" As I understand it, it is a nature photography critique term that says something along the lines of: the people who take only "perfect" nature photos (making sure that all signs of development, pollution, etc. are out of the view finder) & proliferate them in nature calendars, magazines, etc., are in a way, doing a disservice to conservation..."
I chewed on her words all day and can't seem to get settled with the concept of ecoporn. On one hand I absolutely concur that we are losing precious landscapes. My own county has allowed some brilliant construction and billboards (insert heavy sarcasm) in our area. Yet, I don't believe that the act of photographing beautiful landscapes proliferates the destruction of land by giving a false impression of the bountiful amount of such landscapes. Instead, what kills beautiful space is either the lack of value for such property and/or the absence of planning/conservancy for these places. And indeed, I have also come across stunning development and architecture that cohesively blends man's need for shelter with the environment.
And in that spirit, I point you in the direction of two photographers on my blogroll that often have stunning shots of their manmade environments. Please visit Tamara at Luminous Lens and Dean at his DMB Photoblog . And Andrea, thank you for introducing the whole Ecoporn concept to me. It has been some tasty food for thought.
Recent Comments